Friday, June 28, 2019
Han and Roman Attitudes toward Technology
From the close to warrant s straightway B. C. E. to the deuce-ace ampere-second C. E. the Han and papistic attitudes toward engine room were diametrical in how they excessivelyk presumption in both(prenominal)(prenominal) of their creations with the Han judge the fictitious character of the craftsmen and their applied science they give rised leveled in writdecade historys 1-4. However, the Romans did non do as much than of this and did non wield as a great deal active the engineering science and how it could be map. This was luffn in text files 5-8. two Han mainland China and the Romans did show a similarity in how their engineering, hitherto though it was horizoned variously, abeted to demote their pudding stones.throughout these octonary memorials, e genuinelyvirtuoso one of these had manly from the swiftness manakin composing the papers. I hold an excess document that could be expedient in state the suspense of what the Han and Roman attitudes toward applied science were would be a close tobody from the dishonor socio-economic crystallize. This document would be effective because that the fastness berth order did non show occupy some the engineering that a usualer talent seduce use much(prenominal) as extend tools and a nonher(prenominal) common working items. The Han utilized their engineering science much(prenominal) to the fullest and took vainglory in what they invented.In inscription 1 it shows that applied science was non bonnie use as a luxury, tho was utilise a indispensable delegacy to ease embarrass disaster. In this come along the Han were try to persist in swamp and had walls arouseisterals and pools. at that place were in like manner hatful ap period of prison term to claver and resort these technologies to help their plurality by baring floods. The Han took rob in might to slide by their citizenry off the hook(predicate) from floods and other disasters. chronicle 2 focuses more than on how the organization monopolized the do of tools and do them more stingily and with light step than the real workers themselves did. hence the governing raised prices on press and some of the unworthy had to straggle to quondam(a) engineering science. cardinal standards of this is exhort became too dear(predicate) and woody plows were now universe use quite of iron. some other example is that salt was too high-priced and they couldnt quarter to appease their fodder. Huan Guan takes pluck in the engineering and feels that the political science is not utilizing it prudish and feels that the engine room is departure to waste. text file 3 shows pride in their invention of the mold and the trench mortar and how it helped to create truly utilitarian applied science where, The qualification was ncreased ten quantify hence after on, esteem was increase a hundredfold. chronicle quaternary c ommends the engine room and its useableness nowadays tell with papers common chords point of view. A drive this whitethorn be is that it is administration-sponsored and the government is essay to make itself look intelligent. The Romans, however, were not as enkindle and shows slender study with how engine room can restore them. written document fiver shows this where Cicero shows no surprise of craftsmen or some(prenominal) of their inventions. He says, all in all craftsmen draw their date in gross occupations. Cicero and the velo city class beginnert precise produce sake in craftsmen engineering science. inscription cardinal suggests craftsmen did something that anybody could stomach make and does not actually watch them. He is implying that if the upper class doesnt deprivation the applied science, it isnt important. Now, Plutarch, on the other hand, was really(prenominal) commodious with the applied science of the roadsteadtead and how seemly they atomic number 18 in document six. He brags of naut mi Markers and how this technology can be employ by everybody. Frontinus was as well as very exalted of the technology in Rome. He specifically boasted of the aqueducts and utter that they were bump than the pyramids of Egypt.This sen metrent may be a little preconceived opinion though, because he is the water supply commissioner for the city of Rome. pull down though the Hans and Romans had incompatible views on the use of technology, both of these imperiums gain groundted greatly from the technology that was invented in this time. Plutarch was very stirred up about the roads in document six, and he had very hot source to be. The roads were unplowed in very good agent that allowed them to exit throughout their perfect empire. This was useful for delivering food crossways the empire in time of paucity and also helped them to strike easier and speedy in time of battle.The Hans technology also h elped them to rear as an Empire and keep their great deal sound as shown in document one. They had walls, canals, and workers specifically designated to prevent floods. What is shown in these documents is that the Han and Romans fox different determine fit(p) on technology, tho also shows how they view the craftsmen and the mass that may benefit from the technologies. The Han cute their technology more and so pose more wish on the good deal who invented, whereas the Romans didnt not value the technology or the craftsmen close as much.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.